| 000 | 01044cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132933 | ||
| 008 | 060323n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132933 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aPhillippo, Peter | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aMultiple adjudications |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aContract Journal _v432(6567) 22 March 2006, 26(1) |
|
| 520 | _aReports the facts of, and comments upon, "Quietfield Ltd v Vascroft Ltd" ([2006] EWHC 174 TCC, L132952), where it was decided that a contractor, in adjudication proceedings may rely, by way of defence for a claim for damages, upon an alleged entitlement to an extension of time, regardless of whether that entitlement has been notified to the referring party. A contractor cannot, however, rely upon an alleged entitlement which has been considered and rejected in previous adjudication proceedings. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA280306 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aQUIETFIELD LTD V VASCROFT CONTRACTORS LTD |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76700 _d76700 |
||