000			01372cab a2200289 4500
001			##L132972
008			060328n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u132972
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aHolbrook, Jon
245	0	0	_aPossession orders
260			_c2006
490		0	_aSolicitors' Journal _v150(10) 17 March 2006, 323-326(3)
520			_aConsiders the problems posed by the making of suspended possession orders in the light of the decision in "Ealing LBC v Richardson" ([2005] EWCA 1798, unreported) when the CA allowed the defendant to stay in her home despite having breached the terms of a suspended possession order made nine years earlier. Outlines a series of steps that can be taken to prevent this state of affairs, covering matters up to the making of a possession order, after an order has been made, and the situation if judgment is suspended.
590			_aIKA280306
650	2	4	_aEALING LBC V RICHARDSON
650	2	4	_aNORTH BRITISH HOUSING ASSOCIATION LTD V MATTHEWS
650	2	4	_aCAPITAL PRIME PLUS V WILLS
650	2	4	_aGOLDTHORPE V BAIN
650	2	4	_aVANDERMOLEN V TOMA
650	2	4	_aTAJ V ALI
650	2	4	_aTHOMPSON V ELMBRIDGE BC
650	2	4	_aSOUTHWARK LBC V ST BRICE
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
700	1		_aO'Toole, Gerard
942			_n0
999			_c76730 _d76730