000			01300cab a2200205 4500
001			##L133029
008			060404n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133029
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBingham, Tony
245	0	0	_aToo much?
260			_c2006
490		0	_aBuilding _v271(8424) 31 March 2006, 62-63(2)
520			_aReports the facts of, and comments upon, "Rankilor and another v M Igoe Ltd" ([2006] TCC, Salford District Registry,unreported), where it was contended that an adjudicator had made findings of fact based on his expert assessment of a laboratory analysis when the findings had not been contended for by either party, and neither party had had the opportunity to comment upon them. The author argues that an adjudicator should tell the parties how a decision was reached, if one or the other asks for further information, as this may prevent a complaint being made or legal proceedings being taken.
590			_aIKA110406
650	2	4	_aRANKILOR (1) AND PERCO ENGINEERING SERVICE LTD (2) V M IGOE LTD
650	2	4	_aCARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD V DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LTD
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
942			_n0
999			_c76753 _d76753