000			01385cab a2200229 4500
001			##L133032
008			060404n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133032
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aCobb, Laurence
245	0	0	_aOr not enough
260			_c2006
490		0	_aBuilding _v271(8424) 31 March 2006, 62-63(2)
520			_aReports the facts of, and comments upon, "Kier Regional Ltd v City and General (Holborn) Ltd" ([2006] All ER (D) 64 TCC, L133402), where it was decided that an adjudicator's decision was not invalidated by a refusal to consider expert's reports that were produced after the adjudication had begun. The court has thus shown that it is willing to uphold the adjudication process, and will ignore technical legal arguments advanced against an adjudicator's decision. Whilst the rules of natural justice still apply in adjudication, only very clear cases of breach will invalidate a decision.
590			_aIKA110406
650	2	4	_aKIER REGIONAL LTD (T/A WALLIS) V CITY AND GENERAL (HOLBORN) LTD
650	2	4	_aCARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD V DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LTD
650	2	4	_aBUXTON BUILDING CONTRACTORS V DURAND PRIMARY SCHOOL GOVERNORS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
700	1		_aWrzesien, Tom
942			_n0
999			_c76756 _d76756