000			01590cab a2200265 4500
001			##L133038
008			060405n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133038
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aSwerling, Leon
245	0	0	_aAdverse possession _b points of practice
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEMIS Property Service _v4(3) 2006, 3-5(3)
520			_aReviews the law of adverse possession which has become unsatisfactory following the key cases of "J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom" (ECHR 44302/02, L131742) and "Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer" ([2005] EWHC 817 (Ch), L129526). Examines the four different regimes for adverse possession that practitioners will have to grapple with: registered land before the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) which came into force on 2 October 2000; registered land after the HRA came into force and before the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA) came into force on 13 October 2003; registered land after the LRA, and unregistered land. Concludes that the state of adverse possession law is such that government may be forced to review the law. Notes.
590			_aIKA110406
650	2	4	_aJ A PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
650	2	4	_aPYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aBEAULANE PROPERTIES LTD V PALMER
650	2	4	_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 SCHED 6 PARA 1(1)
650	2	4	_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650	2	4	_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S3(1)
650	2	4	_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL-REGISTRATION OF TITLE TO PROPERTY-LAND REGISTRATION
942			_n0
999			_c76760 _d76760