| 000 | 00971cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133111 | ||
| 008 | 060411n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133111 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aSerious irregularity _bprocedural and substantive aspects of section 68 |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aArbitration Law Monthly _vMarch 2006, 3-5(3) |
|
| 520 | _aThe decision in "Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd" ([2005] TCC, unreported) illustrates the unwillingness of the courts to allow spurious procedural objections raised under the Arbitration Act 1996 s68 to challenge the outcome of an arbitration. The case set out a procedural checklist for applications under s68, on all of which the claimants failed. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA110406 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSINCLAIR V WOODS OF WINCHESTER LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76809 _d76809 |
||