000			01323cab a2200193 4500
001			##L133114
008			060411n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133114
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aPublic policy and failure to deal with all issues
260			_c2006
490		0	_aArbitration Law Monthly _v6(4) April 2006, 6-7(2)
520			_aIn "Protech Projects Construction (Pty) Ltd v Al-Kharafi and Sons" ([2005] EWHC 2165 (Comm), unreported), two challenges were raised under the Arbitration Act 1996 s68 to a series of awards arising out of a construction dispute. The first challenge was an assertion that the successful party had withheld material facts at the arbitration, amounting to a serious irregularity; the second challenge was on the award of costs. Both challenges were dismissed. The court emphasised that serious prejudice had to be shown for a claim under s68 to be successful, and reiterated that it would not allow that section to be used to challenge an award on its merits on what was in reality an error of law.
590			_aIKA110406
650	2	4	_aPROTECH PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION (PTY) LTD V AL-KHARAFI AND SONS
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
999			_c76811 _d76811