000			01582cad a22001815a 4500
001			##L133211
008			060420e20060301stk v 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133211
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aBen Cleuch Estates Ltd v Scottish Enterprises _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] CSOH 35, 1 March 2006. Considered whether a break notice had been validly served by S on a property acquired on 14 October 2002. S had the benefit of a break option to terminate the lease 10 years early and sought to exercise that option, serving a formal notice of this intention. However, the notice was served on an associated company, Bonnytoun Estates Ltd. B contented that the notice was invalid and consequently raised court proceedings for the lease to continue until 2016. S argued that because B was a subsidiary of Bonnytoun Estates Ltd, the companies had the same registered office and company director, that was all that was required. As a secondary argument, S presented evidence of invoices issued by the B's agent that indicated that B was acting on behalf of Bonnytoun Estates Ltd. "Held" : Court ruled in favour of B. It was ruled that S had not thoroughly checked the details of the formal notice.
650	2	4	_aBEN CLEUCH ESTATES LTD V SCOTTISH ENTERPRISE
651		4	_aScotland _y1999-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2006csoh35.html _zView the Judgment at www.scotcourts.gov.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c76865 _d76865