| 000 | 01113cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133261 | ||
| 008 | 060424n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133261 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aRowson, Stuart | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aIn the wake of Midland Expressway |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v271(8427) 21 April 2006, 70-71(2) |
|
| 520 | _aConsiders the implications of the decision in "Midland Expressway v Carillion Construction Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 2963, L132321) for PFI subcontracting. Examines the circumstances in which Equivalent Project Relief (EPR) provisions can be challenged, and the steps that can be taken by project companies to mitigate the risk of claims from subcontractors. These include share transfer restrictions, subordination of claims provisions, or inclusion of a longstop final date for any monetary EPR claims. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA250406 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMIDLAND EXPRESSWAY V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD AND OTHERS |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aCaridia, Simon | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76893 _d76893 |
||