| 000 | 01092cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133263 | ||
| 008 | 060424n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133263 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aCaletka, Tony | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aRight from the start |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v271(8427) 21 April 2006, 72(1) |
|
| 520 | _aArgues that the Society of Construction Law's (SCL's) delay and disruption protocol provides a framework for agreeing a method of assessing how the impact of events will be determined, which is now more important than ever following the decision in "Midland Expressway v Carillion Construction Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 2963, L132321). The protocol recommends that the impact of changes or events are measured against the updated and approved programme. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA250406 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMIDLAND EXPRESSWAY LTD V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD AND OTHERS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSOCIETY OF CONSTRUCTION LAW DELAY AND DISRUPTION PROTOCOL |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76895 _d76895 |
||