000			01394cab a2200193 4500
001			##L133303
008			060428n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133303
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aFortfeiture and section 146 notice _bgetting it right _bWaycourt Ltd v Viscount Chelsea and another _bCourt of Appeal, 20 March 2006 (unreported)
260			_c2006
490		0	_aCommercial Leases _v20(4) April 2006, 1091-1092(2)
520			_aDiscusses the main issues of the case "Waycourt Ltd v Viscount Chelsea and another" ([2006] EWCA Civ 511, unreported). The case consisted of how W, head lessee of a building had carried out alterations on some storage vaults (accessible by a single door) by converting them into a kitchen and dining area with access from two entrances. In doing so, V (who had the freehold) asserted that W had breached a clause in the lease that stated that alterations to the layout of the premises were not permitted. The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that alteration had clearly taken place. The article warns that s146 notices must be drafted with the utmost care and double checked for any discrepancies.
590			_aIKA090506
650	2	4	_aWAYCOURT LTD V VISCOUNT CHELSEA AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
690			_aCOMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-FORFEITURE OF BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
999			_c76919 _d76919