| 000 | 01223cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133328 | ||
| 008 | 060502n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133328 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aAgreement to arbitrate |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aArbitration Law Monthly _v6(5) May 2006, 9-10(2) |
|
| 520 | _aIn "Axa Re v Ace Global Markets Ltd" ([2006] EWHC 216 Comm, unreported), the court had to decide whether reference in a reinsurance agreement requiring arbitration in London prevailed over an express clause declaring that English law and jurisdiction applied, in the event that they could not be reconciled. It was held that there was no basis for giving priority to the law and jurisdiction clause, and that the two conflicting clauses could be reconciled. The court was satisfied that the arbitration clause was incorporated by reference, as both parties were aware of it, and that the law and jurisdiction clause did not preclude such incorporation. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA090506 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aAXA RE V ACE GLOBAL MARKETS LTD |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION-ARBITRATORS-ARBITRATORS' JURISDICTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76937 _d76937 |
||