000			01089cab a2200193 4500
001			##L133406
008			060505n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133406
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBingham, Tony
245	0	0	_aWas Ellis right on Wallis?
260			_c2006
490		0	_aBuilding _v271(8429) 5 May 2006, 57(1)
520			_aDiscusses "Kier Regional Ltd v City and General (Holborn) Ltd" ([2006] EWHC 848, TCC, L133402). This decision makes it clear that not only is irrelevant evidence inadmissible, so is relevant evidence containing new allegations which the other party has not had time to answer. The adjudicator's rejection of expert reports delivered at a late stage in the adjudication did not invalidate his decision; even if he was wrong in doing so, this was an error in law, which did not void his decision.
590			_aIKA090506
650	2	4	_aKIER REGIONAL LTD V CITY AND GENERAL (HOLBORN) LTD
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c76985 _d76985