| 000 | 01450cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133425 | ||
| 008 | 060508n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133425 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, Martin | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aIt's time for a breather |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0615) 15 April 2006, 132(1) |
|
| 520 | _aArgues that the planning system needs a period of consolidation after a period of comprehensive reform. Planning has evolved from having a simple regulatory role to being an increasingly complex system and the changes have not always improved the system. Asks whether the planning system can meet the major challenges such as the provision of sufficient new housing in the right places and at the right time. Suggests that the judgment is not encouraging in "Ensign Group Ltd v First Secretary of State", ([2006] EWHC 255 (Admin), L133424) where part of a sub-regional strategy was quashed as a result of the SoS conceding that he had misunderstood the panel's recommendation. Concludes that the jury is still out on whether the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 reforms will be successful. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aENSIGN GROUP LTD V FIRST SOS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPLANNING AND COMPENSATION ACT 1991 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 |
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aMartin, John | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76997 _d76997 |
||