| 000 | 01033cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133514 | ||
| 008 | 060516n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133514 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aClegg, Virginia | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPlanning gain supplement |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstate Agent _vMay 2006, 20(1) |
|
| 520 | _aLooks at three issues central to the proposed introduction of Planning Gain Supplement: whether it would improve housing supply; concerns relating to the re-introduction of a development gains tax, and the scaling back of s106. Concludes that it clearly not in the interest of government or the property industry to introduce a tax originally intended to increase housing supply that would in fact achieve the opposite. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA230506 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77052 _d77052 |
||