000			01597cab a2200205 4500
001			##L133578
008			060519n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133578
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCopping v Surrey County Council
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] EWCA Civ 1604, 21 December 2005. An appeal by C against the decision made in ([2005] EWHC 754 (QB), L130821) which established that a right to buy under the Housing Act 1985 Part V does not exist independently of the notice of claim, and that the absence of an express provision in the Act does not mean that a claim cannot be abandoned or withdrawn. C appealed against the decision that the appropriate date of valuation of their property was the date of their second notice claiming to exercise the right to buy and not their first notice twelve years before. C submitted that if a claim under s122 was denied but not withdrawn in writing, it should remain effective. "Held": Appeal dismissed on the basis that C's right to buy had been established in County Court proceedings that were based solely on the claim made under the second notice.
590			_aIKA230506
650	2	4	_aCOPPING V SURREY CC
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1985 s122(1)
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1985 s124(1)(B)
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES-RESIDENTIAL LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1604.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77090 _d77090