| 000 | 01988cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133589 | ||
| 008 | 060522n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133589 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aLegal and General Assurance Society Ltd v Expeditors International (UK) Ltd |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2006] 18 EG 151 (CS) (1) |
|
| 520 | _aChD, 28 April 2006. "Considers whether a break clause terminating commercial leases was effective because the tenant had not delivered up the premises with vacant possession. E had served break notices and subsequently reached a settlement with L, releasing E on payment of £172 000 from any further liabilities under the lease. E covenanted to keep the premises in no worse a state than they were at the date when a schedule of dilapidations had been produced. L claimed arrears of rent and service charges contending that the break clause was invalid as the premises were not with vacant possession. E argued that a full and final settlement had been reached earlier and the lease had been validly terminated. "Held": claim dismissed. The parties had agreed that the break clause notices had terminated the leases and the sum paid to L had been calculated on that basis. L could not resile from the agreed compromise. It was not necessary to determine whether vacant possession had been granted in the instant case. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA230506 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aNORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V PRESTON |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LTD V EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL (UK) LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCUMBERLAND CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS LTD V IRELAND |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHYNES V VAUGHAN |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aROYAL BANK OF CANADA V SOS DEFENCE |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aJOHN LAING CONSTRUCTION LTD V AMBER PASS LTD |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-BREACHING COMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77095 _d77095 |
||