000			01956cab a2200229 4500
001			##L133596
008			060522n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133596
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aSouth Bedfordshire District Council v John Price and others
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWCA Civ 493, 5 May 2006. Considers whether a committal order made for failing to comply with an injunction restraining breach of planning control should be suspended pending the result of a planning appeal. P had appealed against committal orders and sought permission to appeal against the judge's refusal to vary or discharge an injunction restraining breach of planning control ([2005] EWHC 2031 (QB), L131328). The judge refused to vary or discharge S's injunction against P and made committal orders, suspended for two months. P contended that the committal order be suspended until the outcome of his appeal was known and that policy changes as expressed in ODPM Circular 01/06 made it much more likely that at least a temporary permission would be obtained. "Held": appeal dismissed. The judge's refusal to suspend the injunction could not be said to be wrong on any basis. Permission to appeal on that issue was refused. It would only be right to suspend the committal order pending the planning appeal result if there was clear evidence that the appeal would succeed. he new circular would not markedly strengthen its chances of success.
590			_aIKA230506
650	2	4	_aSOUTH BEDFORDSHIRE DC V PRICE AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aODPM CIRCULAR 01/2006
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S187B
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
651		4	_aEngland _y886-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING ENFORCEMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/493.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii...
942			_n0
999			_c77101 _d77101