000			01327cab a2200193 4500
001			##L133609
008			060523n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133609
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aLane, Patrick M. M.
245	0	0	_aDisruption and delay _bfair entitlement and the regulation of risk
260			_c2006
490		0	_aConstruction Law Journal _v22(2) 2006, 92-116(25)
520			_aArgues that whilst most standard form contracts provide for the completion date to be extended under certain defined circumstances, few address the questions as to how extension of time is to be determined and how compensation is to be valued. So far as disruption is concerned, contracts are often silent, and reliance is instead placed on breach of a tacit term of the contract that the employer will not interfere with the contractor's performance of its work, which is often the cause of disputes. The more certainty there is in identifying and defining the allocation of risk in the contract, the less scope there is for dispute between the parties
650	2	4	_aFIDIC CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT 1999 EDITION
650	2	4	_aFIDIC CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT FOR WORKS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION FOURTH EDITION
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
942			_n0
999			_c77113 _d77113