000			01459cab a2200205 4500
001			##L133640
008			060525n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133640
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aDonington Park Leisure Limited v Wheatcroft and Son Limited
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWHC 904 (Ch), 7 April 2006. Considers to what extent a court can help parties to resolve outstanding issues in their licence agreement. Tenant DPL and landlord WSL fell out over what terms they had agreed. The oral agreement concerned land to be used as car parking for the British Motorcycle Grand Prix. WSL argued that access was restricted and that the land could be used only for parking cars and motorcycles. "Held": DPL was entitled to access via all the gates, but was required to give adequate notice; also, restrictions applied as to the type of vehicle and paraphernalia such as barriers. The court can imply a term into an agreement to provide it with business efficacy. It cannot imply a term on the grounds of making an agreement better or fairer.
590			_aIKA060606
650	2	4	_aDONINGTON PARK LEISURE LTD V WHEATCROFT AND SON LTD
650	2	4	_aLIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL V IRWIN
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2006/904.htm _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77127 _d77127