000			01621cab a2200193 4500
001			##L133645
008			060525n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133645
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aThe Council of the City of Plymouth v D R Jones (Yeovil) Ltd
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] EWHC 2356 (TCC) 31 October 2005. P awarded a contract to D to carry out building works. P later asserted that the contract did not accurately reflect what had been agreed between the parties, specifically on issues concerning date of formation of the contract, which documents were incorporated in the contract, the relevant dates for performance, and contractual working hours. An arbitrator found against P on all four issues. P sought leave to appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996 s69. "Held" the issues raised by P related to errors of fact, not law. Even if there had been an error of law, it did not substantially effect the rights of the parties. Nor had P been able to show that there had been an obvious error on the face of the arbitrator's award itself; indeed the arbitrator had almost certainly been right on every issue. Permission to appeal was refused.
650	2	4	_aPLYMOUTH CITY COUNCIL V D R JONES (YEOVIL) LTD
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S69
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION-ARBITRATION AWARDS
856	4	1	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/2356.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77131 _d77131