000			02188cab a2200277 4500
001			##L133713
008			060605n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133713
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aKnowsley Housing Trust v Anita McMullen
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWCA Civ 539, 9 May 2006. Considers the validity of a suspended possession order. Appeal by M against a suspended order of possession of her home in favour of K. M, a person deemed disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, lived with her son, a serial young offender. K claimed possession on the grounds that M and predominantly her son had been guilty of nuisance and damage to the house. The judge ruled that the possession order was to be suspended if no further acts of nuisance were committed by M or her son. M argued against the validity of the order on the grounds that she was unable to control her son and that the order should have contained a term requiring K, if it wished to apply for the issue of a warrant of possession, to apply to the court on notice to M for permission to apply."Held": appeal dismissed. No general principle exists that an immediate or suspended order of possession should not be made where a tenant cannot control the nuisance-making behaviour of another member of its household. The judge's order was amended to make K apply to the court on notice to M if it wanted to apply for a warrant of possession.
590			_aIKA060606
650	2	4	_aKNOWSLEY HOUSING TRUST V MCMULLEN
650	2	4	_aPORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL V BRYANT
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1988
650	2	4	_aST BRICE AND ANOTHER V SOUTHWARK LBC
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1988 PART II SCHED 2 GROUND 12
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1988 PART II SCHED 2 GROUND 13
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1988 PART II SCHED 2 GROUND 14
650	2	4	_aDISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES-BREACHING RESIDENTIAL LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/539.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77169 _d77169