000			01718cab a2200205 4500
001			##L133716
008			060605n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133716
041	0		_aeng
245			_aR (on the application of James Casey and others) v Crawley Borough Council and Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWHC 301 (Admin), 1 March 2006. Concerns the reasonableness of a local authority's action in deciding to issue possession proceedings against travelers who had encamped on land so as to cause nuisance to others. Application by CA for judicial review of the decision by CR to issue possession proceedings against them in respect of two areas of land. CA argued that CR had acted Wednesbury unreasonably in reaching its possession proceedings decision and their eviction would contravene their Convention rights Art 8. "Held": application refused. CR had taken all material considerations into account and had not acted perversely or Wednesbury unreasonably in its decision. The absence of an alternative site did not bar a local authority from obtaining possession against a trespasser on an unauthorised site where its decision was reasonable in other respects.
650	2	4	_aR V CRAWLEY BC AND THE ODPM EX P JAMES CASEY
650	2	4	_aCHAPMAN V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING ENFORCEMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2006/301.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77171 _d77171