000			01754cab a2200205 4500
001			##L133750
008			060607n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133750
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aR v London Borough of Bromley ex parte Diane Barker
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EUECJ C-290/03, 4 May 2006. Considers a number of matters arising under Directive 85/337/EEC, Arts 1(2), 2(1) and 4(2); whether a decision as to planning consent was purely a matter for national law, whether an environmental impact assessment was required if, at the time approval for reserved matters was sought, it was clear that the project might have significant effects on the environment, and whether national law could preclude an authority from requiring that such an assessment be carried out at a later stage of the planning process. "Held" for the purposes of Directive 85/337/EEC, the classification of a decision as a development consent must be carried out pursuant to national law in a manner consistent with EC law. Arts 2(1) and 4(2) had to be interpreted as requiring an environmental impact assessment to be carried out, if in the course of granting a staged consent, it became apparent, during the second stage, that the project was likely to have significant effects on the environment.
590			_aIKA200606
650	2	4	_aR V BROMLEY LBC EX P BARKER
650	2	4	_aDIRECTIVE 85/337/EEC
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
856	4	1	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/eu/cases/EUECJ/2006/C29003.html _zView the item free of charge at http://www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77188 _d77188