| 000 | 01058cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133752 | ||
| 008 | 060607n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133752 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aKitson, Tony | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aWe need a plan |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v271(8433) 2 June 2006, 50-51(2) |
|
| 520 | _aExamines the implications of the decision in "R v Bromley LBC ex p Barker" ([2006] EUECJ C290/03, L133750). Developers must henceforth be prepared to incur additional costs and delays in carrying out environmental impact assessments at the reserved matters stage, even if one was not required for outline permission. Outlines the circumstances in which an assessment is likely to be required at reserved matters stage. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aR V BROMLEY LBC EX P BARKER |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDIRECTIVE 85/337/EEC |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aTyler, Clare | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77189 _d77189 |
||