000			01274cab a2200181 4500
001			##L133788
008			060609n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133788
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aPamela Rosemary White v Martin Edward John White
260			_c2000
520			_a[2001] AC 596 (HL), 26 October 2000. Considers the fair division of property in divorce. M appealed and P cross-appealed from a CA judgment that increased P's lump sum provision from one-fifth to two-fifths of the parties' total assets. Both M and P were farmers. The original decision had been to satisfy P's housing and financial needs and allow M to take sole control of the farm business to continue farming. P's wish to have enough money to buy a farm of her own was considered unreasonable. "Held": Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed. The original judge had erred. There is no justification to conclude that the assets of one party become immaterial once the financial needs of the other are satisfied.
650	2	4	_aWHITE V WHITE
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd001026/white-1.htm _zView the judgment free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c77206 _d77206