| 000 | 01524cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L133792 | ||
| 008 | 060609n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u133792 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aThornton, Justine | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPlanning elephant traps |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aNew Law Journal _v156(7228) 9 June 2006, 933-934(2) |
|
| 520 | _aConsiders the decisions in "Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom" (ECJ C508/3, unreported) and "R v Bromley LBC ex p Barker" ([2006] EUECJ C-290/03, L133750). The ECJ decided that development consent must be given uniform interpretation throughout the EU, and that, where there is a multi-stage development consent, a planning authority can be required to carry out an environmental impact assessment at the reserved matters stage, even when no assessment was required on the outline planning application. It would be appropriate to carry out an assessment when it was clear that the project might have significant effects on the environment. Developers and planning authorities must now be prepared to carry out such an assessment at second stage. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aEUROPEAN COMMISSION V UNITED KINGDOM |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aR V BROMLEY LBC EX P BARKER |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aR V SOS TRANSPORT EX P WELLS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDIRECTIVE 85/337/EEC |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aHarwood, Richard | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77208 _d77208 |
||