000 01237cab a2200241 4500
001 ##L133877
008 060615n2006 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u133877
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aGallimore, Michael
245 0 0 _aPlanning gains
260 _c2006
490 0 _aSolicitors' Journal Focus
_v150(22) 9 June 2006, 12-14(2)
520 _aExamines how the Planning Gain Supplement (PGS) proposed by government would impact on land development. Scrutinises key aspects of PGS: cost, payment issues, the relationships with s106 obligations and the allocation of PGS revenue. Outlines the main concerns for developers including the delivery of infrastructure and the range of planning permissions which would trigger PGS. Considers the merits of some alternatives to PGS and notes the largely negative reaction to the PGS consultation paper (L132415).
590 _aIKA200606
650 2 4 _aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980 S278
650 2 4 _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650 2 4 _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650 2 4 _aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING REFORM
942 _n0
999 _c77241
_d77241