000			01437cab a2200193 4500
001			##L133959
008			060623n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133959
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aNorthstar Land Ltd v Maitland Brooks and Jacqueline Brooks
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWCA Civ 756, 14 June 2006. Concerns a property sale transaction where the appellant purchaser (N) claimed that the vendors (B) had been estopped (from denying that the completion time had been extended) by their solicitor's conduct in not responding to the request for an extension. N had exercised its option to purchase B's property and had served notice to complete within 10 working days, but later indicated its wish to extend the deadline. Only on the day of completion did N's solicitor attempt to chase up B's solicitor to obtain agreement, but B's solicitor failed to revert back and N's solicitor did not pursue the matter. "Held": appeal dismissed. N's solicitor had not been entitled to assume that the extension of time had been agreed by omission of a negative response.
590			_aIKA040706
650	2	4	_aNORTHSTAR LAND LTD V BROOKS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/756.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77286 _d77286