000			01498cab a2200277 4500
001			##L133982
008			060627n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133982
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aNorman, Charles
245	0	0	_aCPO _ban issue for human rights law
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0625) 24 June 2006, 200-202(3)
520			_aDiscusses the compatibility of domestic UK law with the European Convention of Human Rights. Considers a judgment by the European Court of Human Rights, "Pye v UK" (ECHR, L131742), a case regarding a squatter's claim for possessory title. Looks at limitation in compulsory purchase and the cases of "Hillingdon London BC v Arc" (CA, Abs62992) and "Co-operative Wholesale Ltd v Chester-le-Street DC" (CA, Abs59282). Argues that there is no reason why limitation periods should apply in cases of compulsory acquisition.
590			_aIKA040706
650	2	4	_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS FIRST PROTOCOL ART 1
650	2	4	_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650	2	4	_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965
650	2	4	_aCOMPULSORY PURCHASE (VESTING DECLARATIONS) ACT 1981
650	2	4	_aPYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aHILLINGDON LBC V ARC LTD
650	2	4	_aCO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE SOCIETY LTD V CHESTER-LE-STREET DC
651		4	_aEUROPEAN
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
999			_c77305 _d77305