000 01228cab a2200229 4500
001 ##L133983
008 060627n2006 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u133983
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aPearce, Amanda
245 0 0 _aFateful abstractions
260 _c2006
490 0 _aEstates Gazette
_v(0626) 24 June 2006, 204-205(2)
520 _aThis "Mainly for students" article looks at the surveyor's input to rent review valuations. Includes sections on preparing the valuation, making the inspection, and why this advice matters. Highlights the relevance of judgments made in "United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley BC" (HL [1977] 243 EG 43) and "Plinth Property Investments Ltd v Mott Hay and Anderson" (CA [1978] 249 EG 1167), regarding the rent review timetable and restrictive user clauses respectively.
590 _aIKA040706
650 2 4 _aUNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC
650 2 4 _aPLINTH PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD V MOTT HAY AND ANDERSON
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-RENT REVIEW (COMMERCIAL LEASES)
700 1 _aBurlinson, David
942 _n0
999 _c77306
_d77306