000			01924cab a2200253 4500
001			##L133997
008			060629n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133997
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aBrian Turner v Kim Jacob
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWHC 1317 (Ch), 8 June 2006. Considers whether an occupier of a property contesting the possible granting of a possession order against her could demonstrate circumstances which would make it inequitable or unconscionable to deprive her of some interest in the property. T sought an order for possession of a property occupied by his estranged wife J. J had left the matrimonial home and moved into a property purchased by her mother for her a few days before her mother died. J's mother had however made a new will in which she left the property to T. J claimed that the property was held on a common intention constructive trust which had arisen on or after the purchase of the property. "Held": judgment in favour of T. J's mother had not intended that the property would be a gift to J nor did J ever indicate to her mother that she had that belief or was acting in reliance on it. J had not established circumstances which made it inequitable or unconscionable for her not to be given some interest in the property. The claim to an interest in the property under a resulting trust was not made out.
590			_aIKA040706
650	2	4	_aYAXLEY V GOTTS
650	2	4	_aJENNINGS V RICE AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aTURNER V JACOB
650	2	4	_aRE HALLETT'S ESTATE
650	2	4	_aRE OATWAY
650	2	4	_aHABIB BANK LTD V HABIB BANK AG ZURICH
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-FREEHOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-OWNER-OCCUPIED FREEHOLD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2006/1317.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77312 _d77312