| 000 | 01012cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L134191 | ||
| 008 | 060717n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u134191 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBailey, Julian | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aRepudiation, termination and quantum meruit |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aConstruction Law Journal _v22(4) 2006, 217-240(24) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses whether a contractor is entitled to recover money on a quantum meruit, rather than claim damages, for work done up to point of termination of a contract, and if so, whether the contract price, or the rates and prices specified in the contract, represent a constraint on the contractor's entitlement. Considers at length how the concept of quantum meruit has developed since the 19th century, and looks at its availability as a remedy. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA180706 | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77400 _d77400 |
||