000			01619cab a2200205 4500
001			##L134221
008			060718n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134221
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aHugh Small v Oliver and Saunders (Developments) Ltd
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWHC 1293 (Ch), 25 May 2006. Considers whether there had been a breach in a restrictive covenant whereby land was not permitted to be used other than as private residences. S and O owned neighbouring properties on a residential estate. O was building an additional house behind the original house and had used part of the original land for access to the new development. S brought proceedings against O in respect of a breach of restrictive covenant under a 1925 conveyance which S claimed stated that the relevant land could not be used for anything but private residences. "Held": S had the benefit of the restrictive covenant not because there was a building scheme but by reason of annexation. O's use of the land for access was a breach of the restrictive covenant. The court ruled that it would be oppressive to grant a permanent injunction and awarded S £3 270 in lieu as damages.
650	2	4	_aSMALL V OLIVER AND SAUNDERS (DEVELOPMENTS) LTD
650	2	4	_aJAMAICA MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY V HILLSBOROUGH LTD
650	2	4	_aREID V BICKERSTAFF
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2006/1293.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77414 _d77414