000			01421cab a2200241 4500
001			##L134250
008			060719n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134250
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aThornton, Justine
245	0	0	_aAdded aggravation
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0628) 15 July 2006, 100-101(2)
520			_aDiscusses how Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) can create problems for developers. Looks at the altered position of supplementary guidance under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Notes relevant case law confirming that guidance has to be consistent with policies in the adopted development plan: "Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc" (HL, [1985] AC 661) and "R (on the application of JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd) v Oxford City Council" ([2002] EWCA Civ 1116, X120700). Explains what may be contained in SPDs and development plan documents produced by local planning authorities, and how developers should approach these documents.
590			_aIKA010806
650	2	4	_aWESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL V GREAT PORTLAND ESTATES PLC
650	2	4	_aR V OXFORD CITY COUNCIL EX P J A PYE (OXFORD) LTD
650	2	4	_aPLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
700	1		_aCatterall, Simon
942			_n0
999			_c77425 _d77425