000			02020cab a2200277 4500
001			##L134264
008			060721n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134264
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aPointon York Group plc v Ann Doreen Poulton
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWCA Civ 1001, 13 July 2006. An incorporeal hereditament constituted premises for the purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 s17. Appellant A had let offices to respondent P under a lease that included the right to use parking spaces during normal working hours. P sublet part of the premises, with this underlease expiring three days before P's lease. P intended to re-occupy the sublet part when the sub-tenant vacated, and informed A of this. In fulfilment of the terminating sub-lease, the sub-tenant decorated and carpeted the premises. Before the preparations for re-occupation were finished, A changed the locks and clamped the cars parked in the spaces. The judge decided that P was in occupation of the property for the purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s23. "Held": appeal dismissed. Occupation of the parking spaces and the laying of the carpet by the sub-tenant were activities for the purpose of P's business; P did not have to be physically present to occupy premises for the purpose of s23.
590			_aIKA010806
650	2	4	_aPOINTON YORK GROUP PLC V POULTON
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S23
650	2	4	_aGRAYSIM HOLDINGS LTD V P & O PROPERTY HOLDINGS LTD
650	2	4	_aBACCHIOCCHI V ACADEMIC AGENCY LTD
650	2	4	_aWHITLEY V STUMBLES
650	2	4	_aJONES V CHRISTY
650	2	4	_aSMALLWOOD V SHEPPARDS
650	2	4	_aLAND RECLAMATION CO LTD V BASILDON DC
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1001.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77430 _d77430