000			01649cab a2200289 4500
001			##L134313
008			060725n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134313
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBhaloo, Zia
245	0	2	_aA game of chance
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0629) 22 July 2006, 124-126(3)
520			_aThe first of two articles on injunctions (see also L134383). Discusses the discretionary nature of injunctions and how this gives rise to a range of value judgments, including that of the parties' behaviour. Looks at the underlying basis for the grant of an injunction - to restrain unlawful conduct or to take positive action? - with reference to "Lunn Poly Ltd v Liverpool and Lancashire Properties Ltd" ([2006] EWCA Civ 430, L133984) and "Jaggard v Sawyer" (CA, Abs52507). Considers whether decisions are being based increasingly on the real merits of the case rather than the application of long-established principle, referring to "Crestfort Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 805 (Ch), L130171).
590			_aIKA010806
650	2	4	_aCRESKA LTD V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC
650	2	4	_aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO
650	2	4	_aLUNN POLY LTD AND ANOTHER V LIVERPOOL AND LANCASHIRE PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aJAGGARD V SAWYER AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aCRESTFORT LIMITED AND OTHERS V TESCO STORES LIMITED AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aGAFFORD V GRAHAM AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aMORTIMER AND ANOTHER V BAILEY AND ANOTHER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
700	1		_aMarsh, Matthew
942			_n0
999			_c77449 _d77449