| 000 | 01062cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L134317 | ||
| 008 | 060725n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u134317 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aVas, Michele | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 | _aThe appropriate method |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0629) 22 July 2006, 128-129(2) |
|
| 520 | _aThis "Mainly for students" article examines the two main methods of challenging planning decisions, judicial review and statutory challenge. These two methods may appear similar, but there are distinct differences. Whichever is used, it is imperative to follow the correct procedures and time frames. Compares and contrasts the usefulness of each method. [Taken from journal abstract]. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA010806 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S287 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aEvans, Matthew | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77452 _d77452 |
||