000			01376cab a2200289 4500
001			##L134383
008			060801n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134383
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBhaloo, Zia
245	0	2	_aA different remedy but the same lottery
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0630) 29 July 2006, 95-96(2)
520			_aThe second of two articles on injunctions. Explains what happens if the court decides that an injunction is not a suitable remedy. Discusses in depth "Lunn Poly Ltd v Liverpool and Lancashire Properties Ltd" ([2006] EWCA Civ 430, L133984) and explains how the surprising judgment came about. Clarifies how damages are assessed on a negotiating basis and lists cases in which damages in lieu have been granted. (See also L134313).
590			_aIKA010806
650	2	4	_aLUNN POLY LTD AND ANOTHER V LIVERPOOL AND LANCASHIRE PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aJAGGARD V SAWYER AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aCRESKA LTD V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC
650	2	4	_aTOP SHOP PRECINCTS LTD V KWIK SAVE STORES LTD
650	2	4	_aYOUNG AND CO'S BREWERY PLC V GORDON
650	2	4	_aDAS AND OTHERS V LINDEN MEWS
650	2	4	_aMIDTOWN LTD V CITY OF LONDON REAL PROPERTY CO LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
700	1		_aMarsh, Matthew
942			_n0
999			_c77497 _d77497