000			01788cab a2200229 4500
001			##L134418
008			060803n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134418
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aInntrepreneur Pub Company (CPC) and others v Bernard Crehan
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] UKHL 38, 19 July 2006. Concerns whether a pub company's beer ties were anti-competitive in the European Community. IPC appealed against a CA decision that its beer ties breached EC Treaty (Nice) Art 81(1). The judge in the original case decided that a condition set out in "Delimitis v Henninger Brau AG" ([1991] ECR 1-935) had not been satisfied in relation to the UK beer market, and therefore IPC had not breached Art 81. The CA reversed this decision, holding that it went against the Commission's view in respect of another brewer, and thus did not comply with Art 10's duty of sincere co-operation. "Held": appeal allowed. There was no possibility of conflict, in the sense discussed in the relevant authorities, between a decision of the Commission and a decision of the national court on the application of EC law. The Commission's decision should be treated simply as evidence properly admissible before an English court.
590			_aIKA010806
650	2	4	_aINNTREPRENEUR PUB COMPANY (CPC) AND OTHERS V CREHAN
650	2	4	_aDELIMITIS V HENNINGER BRAU
650	2	4	_aEC TREATY (NICE) ART 81
650	2	4	_aEC TREATY (NICE) ART 10
651		4	_aEUROPEAN
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEISURE PROPERTY-REFRESHMENT AND CULINARY PROPERTY-LICENSED PROPERTY-LICENSED PREMISES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060719/crehan.pdf _zView the item free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c77512 _d77512