000			01259cab a2200205 4500
001			##L134437
008			060807n 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134437
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aRoss, Jonathan
245	0	0	_aCase news _bJanet Reger International v Tiree
260			_2006
490		0	_aProperty Week _v71(31) 4 August 2006, 54(1)
520			_a[2006] EWHC 1743 (Ch), 17 July 2006. Considers whether a landlord was liable to repair an inherent defect in its premises. Retailer J was forced to leave premises leased from T after a problem with damp, and claimed that T was liable for its losses. T argued it was not liable because the problem was caused by a design fault not covered in the lease, namely a damp-proof membrane in the floor that had not been linked to the damp-proof course in the walls. "Held": there was no implied term in the lease that the landlord would prevent damage to the part of the premises the tenant was liable to repair, therefore the judge found for the landlord.
590			_aIKA010806
650	2	4	_aJANET REGER INTERNATIONAL V TIREE LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
942			_n0
999			_c77526 _d77526