000			01912cab a2200301 4500
001			##L134558
008			060816n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u134558
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aFox, Alasdair G.
245	0	2	_aA debate to be resumed
260			_c2006
490		0	_aJournal of the Law Society of Scotland _v51(6) June 2006, 42(1)
520			_aDiscusses the uncertain position of the law in respect of the validity of irritancy and resumption clauses with limited notice periods relating to leases governed by the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991. Considers "Palmer's Executors v Shaw" ([2003] Scot CS 318, [2004] SLT 261) and "Trustees of the Earl of Stair's 1970 Trust v Robert Downie" which is to be appealed on 23 November 2006. Concludes that until the appeal decision is issued, confusion will remain to the extent that no tenant could be advised to submit to a notice of irritancy or resumption served on the strength of a clause containing a notice period of one month or less or no timescale, in excess of one month within which the tenant can rectify the default which is to give rise to the irritancy or resumption. This state of affairs is causing great difficulties to landlords.
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 2003
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1991
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1991 S18
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1991 S43
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1991 S44
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1949
650	2	4	_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1923
650	2	4	_aTRUSTEES OF THE EARL OF STAIR'S 1970 TRUST V DOWNIE
650	2	4	_aPALMER'S EXECUTORS V SHAW
651		4	_aScotland _y1999-
690			_aPROPERTY-RURAL AND NATURAL ASSETS-AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY
700	1		_aMitchell, John A.
942			_n0
999			_c77560 _d77560