| 000 | 00824cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L134672 | ||
| 008 | 060824n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u134672 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBrewer, Geoff | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aOral contracts |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aContract Journal _v434(6589) 23 August 2006, 20(1) |
|
| 520 | _aComments upon "Maggs v Marsh" ([2006] EWCA Civ 1058, L134669). The decision emphasises that whereas subsequent conduct cannot be taken into account in interpreting the terms of a written contract, it is perfectly permissible to use such evidence where the contract is wholly or partly oral. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA050906 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMAGGS V MARSH |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77617 _d77617 |
||