| 000 | 01235cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L134683 | ||
| 008 | 060825n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u134683 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aKlein, Rudi | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aWhen is ownership passed on? |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aConstruction News _v(6976) 20 July 2006, 25(1) |
|
| 520 | _aExamines the legal situation of a subcontractor or supplier when a main contractor or other subcontractor further up the contractual chain becomes insolvent. In English law, there is no protection for those engaged on construction projects in such a situation, and this position is exacerbated by the lack of protection in standard forms of contract. The decision in "P4 Ltd v Unite Integrated Solutions plc" ([2005] QBD, TCC, not reported) however, confirms that if a materials supplier has the benefit of a retention of title clause then this cannot be defeated by the claims of a party higher up the contractual chain. | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aP4 LTD V UNITE INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS PLC |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aFACTORS ACT 1889 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77620 _d77620 |
||