| 000 | 01239cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L135133 | ||
| 008 | 060926n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u135133 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aTurnbull, Geoffrey K. | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aBig house, little house _brelative size and value |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aReal Estate Economics _v34(3) 2006, 439-456(18) |
|
| 520 | _aExamines the issue of which the market values more highly: the largest house in a neighbourhood of small houses or the smallest house in a neighbourhood of large houses. Using house sales data from one local government area, this problem is looked at in terms three hypotheses: atypicality, the conspicuous consumption effect and the tax capitalization effect. Concludes that of these theories, the estimates are consistent with the fiscal capitalization theory, which leads to lower prices for larger houses and higher prices for smaller houses in the neighbourhood, and/or longer and shorter marketing times respectively. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA031006 | ||
| 651 | 4 | _aUNITED STATES | |
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND VALUATION | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aDombrow, Jonathan | |
| 700 | 1 | _aSirmans, C. F. | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c77798 _d77798 |
||