| 000 | 01415cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54763 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u12178 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd and others | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1996) 2 WLR 262-280(17) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 22 February 1996. In 1987 a lease was assigned to second defendant by licence promising to observe and perform covenants for remainder of lease with third defendant acting as surety to guarantee the performance of obligations by second tenant. In 1989 the premises were assigned to a company which went into voluntary liquidation in 1992. The liquidator disclaimed the lease under Insolvency Act 1986 s178. Plaintiff landlord claimed rent arrears from defendants and was granted summary judgment under RSC Order 14. On appeal upheld CA decision that three defendants were liable to lessor. "Stacey v Hill" 1901 oveturned. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aDISCLAIMERS | ||
| 650 | _aINSOLVENCY ACT 1986 S178 | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aNON-ASSIGNED | ||
| 650 | _aORIGINAL TENANT | ||
| 650 | _aPRIVITY OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ARREARS | ||
| 650 | _aSTACEY V HILL | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c7792 _d7792 |
||