000			02140cab a2200217 4500
001			##L135562
008			061108n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u135562
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aWilliam Verry Ltd v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Camden
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWHC 761 (TCC), 20 March 2006. Considered whether a final valuation could be used to defeat an adjudicator's decision on an interim valuation. W and C entered into a contract and valuations were carried out by an independent firm of quantity surveyors. There had been three adjudications concerning valuations, with the third adjudication determining the interim valuation at practical completion as £6 487 648.37, with C paying V £532 351.61 plus VAT and interest. Before this decision was given, the contract administrator issued a final certificate showing a gross valuation of £5 755 655.51 and an amount due to V of only £46 020.11. After the third adjudicator's decision, C gave notice it would deduct liquidated damages awarded by the third adjudicator from the amount in the final certificate, leaving V owing C £35 275.61. C refused to pay on the third adjudicator's decision and V applied for summary judgment. "Held": the third adjudicator's decision should be enforced and V was entitled to the full amount. An adjudicator's decision was not simply a contractual obligation that could be reduced by other contractual obligations and there was no right to set-off from such an adjudicator's decision.
590			_aIKA141106
650	2	4	_aWILLIAM VERRY LTD V CAMDEN LBC
650	2	4	_aJCT INTERMEDIATE FORM OF BUILDING CONTRACT FOR WORKS OF SIMPLE CONTENT (1998 EDITION)
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2006/761.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77939 _d77939