000			01718cab a2200217 4500
001			##L135723
008			061204n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u135723
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] EWCA Civ 1341, 16 October 2006. Concerned an alleged serious irregularity pursued under the Arbitration Act 1996 s68(4). Applicant ship owner (S) applied for permission to appeal against the judge's refusal of permission to appeal under the Arbitration Act 1968 s68(4). S had alleged apparent bias by the third arbitrator (D) in the arbitration award granted in favour of the respondent charterer (T). The judge had decided there had been apparent bias, but S had waived its objection by failing to make a timely application to remove D under the 1996 Act s24 and by taking up the award. The judge therefore refused permission to appeal. S sought to use the European Convention on Human Rights Art 6 to persuade the CA to give leave to appeal. "Held": the judge's decision was not in breach of the Convention merely because it was wrong and therefore the CA had no jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S68(4)
650	2	4	_aASM SHIPPING LTD OF INDIA V TTMI LTD OF ENGLAND
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/1341.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c77979 _d77979