000			02030cab a2200301 4500
001			L136104
008			070110n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136104
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aLatimer and another v Carney and another
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0650) 16 December 2006, 86-96(11)
520			_aDiscusses a case ([2006] EWCA Civ 1417) where appellant landlord appealed against a decision dismissing their action against their former tenants for breach of a repair covenant in a lease between the parties. The issues on appeal were whether the judge had been right to hold that the landlord had failed to prove the damage to the reversion, whether the landlord should be granted permission to amend their notice of appeal, whether the covenant to redecorate was a repair covenant to which the cap under s.18(1) applied, and whether the judge had been correct to order that the landlord alone should pay the costs of the third respondent in Part 20 proceedings between the tenants. "Held": expert evidence as to the diminution in value of the reversion was not necessary. The judge had correctly found that the court could infer the amount by which the reversion had diminished in value from the evidence as to the estimated cost of the repairs, but the judge had erred in holding that there was no sufficient evidence on the facts of the instant case.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927 S18(1)
650	2	4	_aJOYNER V WEEKS
650	2	4	_aRUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH
650	2	4	_aHANSON V NEWMAN
650	2	4	_aCREWE SERVICES AND INVESTMENT V SILK
650	2	4	_aJONES V HERXHEIMER
650	2	4	_aSHORTLANDS INVESTMENTS LTD V CARGILL PLC
650	2	4	_aCULWORTH ESTATES LTD V SOCIETY OF LICENSED VITUALLERS
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-DILAPIDATIONS
700	1		_aDenyer-Green, Barry P. D.
942			_n0
999			_c78139 _d78139