000			01848cab a2200229 4500
001			L136180
008			070116n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u136180
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aR (on the application of Barker) v Bromley London Borough Council
260			_c2006
520			_a[2006] UKHL 5, 6 December 2006. The respondent planning authority had granted outline planning permission for a development on the site of the park but had not considered at that stage that an environmental impact assessment (EIA) needed to be carried out. When the developer submitted an application for the approval of reserved matters, a number of councillors indicated that they wished an EIA to be carried out before the reserved matters were approved. The issue before the court was whether, by failing to provide for the situations where an EIA might be required at the reserved matters stage, the 1988 Regulations failed fully and properly to implement the Directive. "Held": the European Court of Justice ruled that Art.2(1) and Art.4(2) of Council Directive 85/337 were to be interpreted as requiring an EIA to be carried out if the project was likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of its size, nature or location.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS) REGULATIONS 1988
650	2	4	_aCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE 85/337
650	2	4	_aR V BROMLEY LBC AND ANOTHER EX P BARKER
650	2	4	_aR V SOS TRANSPORT EX P WELLS
651		4	_aLONDON
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
856	4	8	_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd061206/barker-1.htm _zView the item free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c78172 _d78172